Disseminating research
Publishing the results of one’s research is among the most critical responsibilities of every scholar, as well as one of the most challenging and rewarding aspects of academic life. On this page, you will find a carefully organised chronological compilation of all my academic publications. Following this, there is a separate list of book reviews that I have written over the years, reflecting my engagement with ongoing scholarly conversations.
Charles 2023. The History of Hylomorphism: From Aristotle to Descartes. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2023. ISBN: 9780192897664
2025 | Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie (2025): AOP.
Download options
Colonial Scholasticism: Interpreting Nature, Philosophy, and Society in Spanish America
2025 | Edited by Abel Aravena Zamora and Nicola Polloni. London: Routledge, 2025.
Further info
Abstract
The volume reconstructs central tenets of the early modern Scholastic debate that took place in colonial Latin America between the 16th and the 18th centuries. This period coincided with the foundation of American Scholasticism (or “colonial” Scholasticism). On the one hand, the establishment of higher education institutions, first in New Spain and, later, in other administrative regions, seeded a fertile framework that nurtured a new generation of Scholastic philosophers. On the other, the necessity to convert local communities to Christianity (and politically subjugate them) led to the proliferation of training centres and missions where learned Jesuit, Franciscan, and Dominican thinkers tackled the new cultural and natural settings they were experiencing. This twofold process facilitated the inauguration of a long-lasting, albeit often neglected, philosophical tradition in colonial Latin America: a tradition that was structurally bound to European Scholasticism yet also divergent from many of the traditional tropes that characterised its transatlantic developments.
Alonso de la Vera Cruz’s Take on the Conceivability of Prime Matter
2025 | In Colonial Scholasticism: Interpreting Nature, Philosophy, and Society in Spanish America. Edited by Abel Aravena Zamora and Nicola Polloni. London: Routledge, pp. 27-44.
Further info
Abstract
The volume reconstructs central tenets of the early modern Scholastic debate that took place in colonial Latin America between the 16th and the 18th centuries. This period coincided with the foundation of American Scholasticism (or “colonial” Scholasticism). On the one hand, the establishment of higher education institutions, first in New Spain and, later, in other administrative regions, seeded a fertile framework that nurtured a new generation of Scholastic philosophers. On the other, the necessity to convert local communities to Christianity (and politically subjugate them) led to the proliferation of training centres and missions where learned Jesuit, Franciscan, and Dominican thinkers tackled the new cultural and natural settings they were experiencing. This twofold process facilitated the inauguration of a long-lasting, albeit often neglected, philosophical tradition in colonial Latin America: a tradition that was structurally bound to European Scholasticism yet also divergent from many of the traditional tropes that characterised its transatlantic developments.
Untangling Robert Grosseteste’s Hylomorphism: Matter, Form, and Bodiness
2025 | British Journal for the History of Philosophy 33/2: 244-263.
Further info
DOI: 10.1080/09608788.2024.2332425
Abstract
During the thirteenth century, Aristotelian hylomorphism became the cornerstone of scholastic natural philosophy. However, this theory was fragmented into a plurality of interpretations and reformulations, sparking a rich philosophical debate. This article focuses on Robert Grosseteste (d. 1253), one of the earliest Latin philosophers to directly engage with Aristotle’s natural philosophy. Specifically, it delves into Grosseteste’s perspective on hylomorphism, emphasizing two controversial doctrines that characterized British scholasticism in the late thirteenth century: universal hylomorphism and formal pluralism. The former claims that all substances, whether bodily or spiritual, are hylomorphic compounds, that is, they are made of matter and form. Formal pluralism, in turn, maintains that hylomorphic substances possess more than one substantial form simultaneously. After a brief introduction, the paper proceeds, first, to examine the type of hylomorphism endorsed by Grosseteste, shedding light on an obscure passage that seems to suggest universal hylomorphism. Second, the examination expands on Grosseteste’s theory of bodily form and emphasizes the apparent contradiction of this theory with universal hylomorphism. The discussion then turns to Grosseteste’s endorsement of formal pluralism and the functionality he envisioned being expressed by the bodily form. Finally, the paper draws conclusions about Grosseteste’s revised hylomorphic account.
Download options
Hylomorphism into Pieces: Elements, Atoms and Corpuscles in Philosophy, Science, and Medicine (1400–1600)
2024 | Edited by Nicola Polloni and Sylvain Roudaut. Cham: Palgrave McMillan, 2024.
Further info
ISBN: 9783031609268.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-60927-5
Abstract
The volume offers a coherent set of contributions on elements, atoms and corpuscles in late medieval and early modern philosophy and medicine (between ca. 1400 and 1600). Its main focus is the replacement of hylomorphism – the dominant theory of bodies in the Middle Ages – by new theories of matter (corpuscularianism and atomism) at the dawn of the Modern period. The volume will offer a comprehensive view of a crucial historical moment for the history of philosophy and science: the rise of a new conception of matter against declining scholastic theories. The gathered contributions highlight the key aspects of this historical transition by investigating precise concepts that were central to this transition, namely the notions of elements, atoms and corpuscles. While several papers study the semantic evolution of these notions over the defined period, others focus on specific actors of this paradigm shift.
Download options
Hylomorphism into Pieces? Introductory Remarks
2024 | With Sylvain Roudaut. In Hylomorphism into Pieces: Elements, Atoms and Corpuscles in Natural Philosophy and Medicine (1400–1600). Edited by Nicola Polloni and Sylvain Roudaut. Cham: Palgrave McMillan, 2024, pp. 1–25.
Download options
Francisco de Toledo on Elemental Mixtures
2024 | In Hylomorphism into Pieces: Elements, Atoms and Corpuscles in Natural Philosophy and Medicine (1400–1600). Edited by Nicola Polloni and Sylvain Roudaut. Cham: Palgrave McMillan, 2024, pp. 247–276.
Further info
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-60927-5_9
Abstract
How do uniform bodies like wine, oil, and flesh originate in nature from the four elements? This basic question about the constitution of physical substances was the object of a harsh debate that lasted for centuries. Its main issue was the process of mixing. When the four elements are put together under certain favourable conditions, they cause something ‘new’ that displays additional dispositional properties and a novel structure. Yet how is it possible? And what happens to the elements when they are mixed? In this chapter, I analyse how the Spanish philosopher Francisco de Toledo (1532-1596) engaged with these and further questions about mixtures. First, I examine Aristotle’s treatment of the problem in GC I.10 and four crucial clauses that he introduces to explain how mixing happens, which become the blueprints of Toledo’s own theory. Second, I analyse Toledo’s arguments in favour of the complete destruction of the elemental forms upon mixing, which allow him to maintain that the persisting factor required by mixing is expressed by (prime) matter. Third, I discuss Toledo’s arguments in favour of the persistence of the elemental qualities in the mixture as numerically identical. This stance provides a better fulfilment of the persistence clause established by Aristotle and relies on a neat distinction between prime and proximate matters. Finally, I draw my conclusions on Toledo’s theory of mixtures.
Download options
Robert Grosseteste
2024 | With Neil Lewis. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2024 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman.
Further info
URL = <plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2024/entries/grosseteste/>
Late Scholastic Arguments for the Existence of Prime Matter
2024 | Ancient Philosophy Today: Dialogoi 6/1 (2024): 38-64.
Further info
DOI: 10.3366/anph.2024.0102
Abstract
Scholastic hylomorphism conceives prime matter and substantial form as metaphysical parts of every physical substance. During the early modern period, both hylomorphic constituents faced significant criticism as scientists and philosophers sought to replace Aristotelianism with physical explanations for the workings of the universe. This paper focuses specifically on prime matter and delves into the arguments put forth by four 16th-century scholastic philosophers – Toledo, Fonseca, Góis, and Suárez – in their attempts to establish the existence of prime matter. Firstly, I analyse a set of arguments rooted in substantial change, which emphasize the crucial role of a persistent, common substrate in the processes of generation and corruption. Secondly, I explore a set of ex-nihilo arguments and, thirdly, I examine a series of demonstrations based on the interplay between accidental and substantial change. Although these three sets of arguments converge on the necessity of a common substrate for substantial change to occur, they fall short of demonstrating that this substrate is both prime and shared by all natural entities. Fourthly, I turn to a set of arguments centred on the impossibility of infinite regress, designed to complement those related to natural change, and I assess additional arguments that do not primarily focus on substantial change. Lastly, I draw my conclusions on these argumentative strategies to demonstrate the existence of prime matter.
Download options
罗吉尔·培根自然哲学中的质料多元论 [= Material Pluralism in Roger Bacon’s Philosophy of Nature]
2024 | 自然辩证法通讯 [= Journal of Dialectics of Nature] 46/3 (2024): 80-89.
Further info
Abstract
质形论”主张所有的物体都由质料和形式构成。该理论是前现代欧洲哲学史上最具影响和争议的理论之一。它在自然哲学和形而上学方面要面对诸多难题，尤其是质料和形式的本体论地位，以及自然物体（元素和混合物）的本体论构成。围绕上述争论，中世纪思想家罗吉尔·培根（Roger Bacon）坚持实体形式多元论立场，通过主张每一种实体形式都需要与适合它的特定形而上学质料相结合，表述了一个更为多元的形而上学质料理论。这一微妙但根本性的视角转变，确立了一种新的作为自然变迁物理基底的“自然质料”概念，为研究自然变化开启了全新视野。
Download options
Conceiving Prime Matter in the Middle Ages: Perception, Abstraction, and Analogy
2023 | Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 105/3 (2023): 414-443.
Further info
DOI: 10.1515/agph-2020-0147
Abstract
In its formlessness and potentiality, prime matter is a problematic entity of medieval metaphysics and its ontological limitations drastically affect human possibility of conceiving it. In this article, I analyse three influential strategies elaborated to justify an epistemic access to prime matter. They are incidental perception, negative abstraction, and analogy. Through a systematic and historical analysis of these procedures, the article shows the richness of interpretations and theoretical stakes implied by the conundrum of how prime matter can be known by human beings. In particular, the reasons behind the later medieval acceptance of analogy as the main way to unveil prime matter become clearer by pointing out the correlation between the ontological and epistemological levels of the medieval examination of prime matter.
Download options
Sombras de Gundisalvo en la Summa Halensis
2023 | Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 40/2 (2023): 15-24.
Further info
DOI: 10.5209/ashf.77300
Abstract
La contribución de Domingo Gundisalvo a la historia de la filosofía medieval ha sido de fundamental importancia especialmente por su originalidad y sincretismo. Sin embargo, la recepción explícita de las obras de Gundisalvo en el siglo XIII ha sido explorada sólo parcialmente. Este artículo discute el problema desde un punto de vista metodológico a través del examen de un caso particular: la influencia de las obras de Gundisalvo en la Summa Halensis. Después de haber presentado los problemas principales de un análisis del impacto de Gundisalvo en el siglo XIII, el artículo discute algunos ejemplos de la influencia explicita en Roger Bacon y Thomas de York. La ultima parte de la contribución examina el uso del De unitate et uno de Gundisalvo por parte de los autores de la Summa Halensis y un posible ejemplo de influencia implícita de otros textos gundisalvianos en esta obra.
Download options
Ibn Gabirol (Avicebron): Latin and Hebrew Philosophical Traditions
2023 | Edited by Nicola Polloni, Marienza Benedetto, and Federico Dal Bo. Turnhout: Brepols, 2023.
Further info
ISBN: 9782503605524
Abstract
This volume dives into this plurality of voices bearing witness to Ibn Gabirol. Some criticise while others praise him. Some of their arguments in claiming allegiance or refusal are well-grounded, while other may appear quite naive. In any case, the voices of these historical actors constantly considered Ibn Gabirol’s speculation as a reference that could not be tacitly dismissed, even when it was considered to be erroneous. This volume should be considered as an invitation to reconsider Ibn Gabirol’s originality and his pivotal contribution to the history of philosophy in the Abrahamic tradition on the shores of the Mediterranean Basin. A reconstruction of the entire intricate history of Ibn Gabirol’s impact on both Latin and Hebrew traditions is impossible, for different reasons. Among them, the lack of studies on many medieval philosophers who interacted with Ibn Gabirol’s thought seems to preclude any comprehensive appreciation of his influence on the Latin Middle Ages. In some ways, the echo of Aquinas’s criticism against Ibn Gabirol still appears to be consequential for present-day scholarship. And it results in an unspoken tendency to neglect both the relevance and influence of this great Jewish philosopher.
Download options
Misinterpreting Ibn Gabirol? Questions, Doubts, and Remarks on a Problematic Latin Translation
2023 | In Ibn Gabirol (Avicebron): Latin and Hebrew Philosophical Traditions. Edited by Nicola Polloni, Marienza Benedetto, and Federico Dal Bo. Turnout: Brepols, 2023, pp. 49-68
Further info
Abstract
The present contribution aims to cast some light on the questions about whether and how Gundissalinus and John of Spain have Aristotelised the Fons vitae. I want to provide scholarship with contextual data and some further doubts about the making of the Latin translation of Ibn Gabirol’s work. In the first section, I expound the main historical coordinates of Dominicus Gundissalinus’s activity as translator and philosopher. Next, the second section examines Gundissalinus’s interpretation of Ibn Gabirol and his gradual detachment from some of Ibn Gabirol’s doctrines he previously held. Gundissalinus’s disingenuousness in his first reception of the Fons vitae is then contrasted with Ibn Daud’s harsh criticism of Ibn Gabirol. My analysis shows that Ibn Daud interprets the Fons vitae in a noticeably Aristotelian way, consistent with the Latin rendering of the text. Finally, in the last section, I explore different possibilities (and raise some doubts) about the Latin translation of the Fons vitae.
Download options
Dominicus Gundissalinus’s On Unity and the One
2023 | In Contextualizing Premodern Philosophy: Explorations of the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin Traditions. Edited by Luís Xavier López Farjeat, Katja Krause, and Nicholas Oschman. London: Routledge, 2023, pp. 293-308.
Further info
Abstract
This chapter offers the first English translation of a treatise by Dominicus Gundissalinus (ca. 1115–post 1190), On Unity and the One (De unitate et uno), completed by an introduction to the main theoretical coordinates discussed in the treatise. In his first philosophical work, Gundissalinus treats a delicate metaphysical problem: What do we mean when we say that something is “one”? Grounding his discussion on Ibn Gabirol’s Fons vitae, Gundissalinus’ answer to this question is remarkably Neoplatonic. Proceeding from the true One, unity is the efficient cause of the union of two opposite entities, matter and form, into the ontological individuality proper to each and every created thing. Gundissalinus connects this metaphysical point to various sets of problems, from the hierarchical order of the universe to the difference between discrete and continuous quantities. Accordingly, De unitate et uno is a significant example of the first Latin encounter with Jewish Neoplatonism in a fast-changing landscape that would shift to Aristotelianism only a few decades after Gundissalinus’ death.
Download options
Ordering the Sciences: al-Fārābī and the Latinate Tradition
2022 | With Alexander Fidora. In Ишрак: ежегодник исламской философии [= Ishraq: Islamic Philosophy Yearbook], Vol. 10. Edited by Janis Eshots. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences, 2022, pp. 110-130.
Further info
Abstract
Although al-Fārābī exerted a remarkable influence on medieval Latin philosophy, his reception in and contribution to Western thought have received far less scholarly attention than that of Avicenna and Averroes. In an attempt to redress the balance, the present article argues that al-Fārābī played a central role in some of the major intellectual shifts and changes in 12th– and 13th-century Europe. Thus, we show how al-Fārābī informed the systematic translation of new philosophical corpora – including Aristotle – and how he shaped the ensuing epistemological reorganisation of the medieval ordo scientiarum, which found its institutional expression in the newly established universities and their curricula.
Download options
Fragmented Nature: Medieval Latinate Reasoning on the Natural World and Its Order
2022 | Edited by Mattia Cipriani and Nicola Polloni. London: Routledge, 2022.
Further info
ISBN: 9780367557034
Abstract
This volume examines a plurality of problems, theories, and images of the order and regularity that medieval philosophers and practitioners saw as structuring the natural world. Such richness of perspectives is directly bound to the plurality of epistemes of nature that characterised European philosophy and science in the Middle Ages and to the specificities of the case-studies discussed by the contributors. While most medieval thinkers agreed on considering nature as an ordered structure of interactions, any glimpse of such structure had its own coordinates. Different domains engaged with nature according to their own methods and assumptions. Consideration of a diverse set of animals or plants may lead to diverse sets of features and theories. And the reading of an authoritative text could apport very different ideas in one period and another, in one tradition and its competitor. Yet in all these cases, philosophers and practitioners not only looked at nature appreciating its order, but had to order themselves nature in return, prescribing (and proscribing) rules, texts, behaviours, and narratives. Hence, the natural order of the universe is based on the theoretical reordering of data, solutions, and theories by interested practitioners.
Download options
Toledan Translators, Roger Bacon, and the Dynamic Shades of Experience
2022 | In Premodern Experience of the Natural World in Translation. Edited by Katja Krause, Maria Auxent, and Dror Weil. London: Routledge, 2022, pp. 325-340.
Further info
Abstract
Medieval literary cultures were nurtured by translations from other languages. Particularly, medieval European philosophy is rooted on translations of theoretical and practical texts from Greek and Arabic. These translations can be considered as ‘objects of experience’ that are impacted by the societal world of the translators and impact in return on the perception of the extra-mental world of their readers. This contribution examines how different ‘shades’ of the historical actors’ experience of the external world about translations. First, the chapter discusses the social and personal interactions of translators working in medieval Toledo and the translation activities that resulted. Second, it examines Roger Bacon’s criticism of translations and his use of “experience” to sustain his argument, stressing the persuasive function that his accounts of experience perform in the text. The results of this case-studies examination show the irreducibility of the notion of ‘experience’ to a fixed restricted meaning and stress the role of translations as ‘epistemic vessels of experiences’ that may be personal, accounted, or persuasively invented.
Download options
Caos a Toledo: Domenico Gundisalvi, Daniele di Morley e la corporeità della materia prima
2022 | In Verba et mores: Studi per Carla Casagrande. Edited by Chiara Crisciani and Gabriella Zuccolin. Rome: Aracne, 2022, pp. 301-319.
Further info
Abstract
Questo contributo si concentra su un aspetto della riflessione intellettuale di Daniele di Morley che mostra alcune vicinanze – e opposizioni – con alcune critiche espresse da Domenico Gundisalvi. Nello specifico, Gundisalvi attacca duramente la dottrina del caos primordiale in quanto inammissibile da un punto di vista ilemorfico. Daniele di Morley discute lo stesso problema e rigetta parzialmente questa teoria, tuttavia da un punto di vista differente: la materia originale è necessariamente corporea. Nelle pagine seguenti discuterò le posizioni di questi due filosofi rispetto a come il caos primordiale si relazioni alla teoria della materia prima, cercando di delineare punti di contatto e coordinate interpretative di questo problema.
Download options
Medieval Universes in Disorder: Primeval Chaos and Its Authoritative Coordinates
2022 | In Fragmented Nature: Medieval Latinate Reasoning on the Natural World and Its Order. Edited by Mattia Cipriani and Nicola Polloni. London: Routledge, 2022, pp. 49-75.
Further info
Abstract
Plato’s theory of primeval chaos marked much of the medieval discussion on cosmogenesis up to the 13th century. Many thinkers from the early Middle Ages agreed with the Timaeus in believing that the universe was originally in a state of chaos and later arranged in the beautiful order we now appreciate. Yet following the Latin translations of Aristotle’s works, Scholastic philosophers would abruptly start to ignore or reject this influential theory. Curiously, instead of acknowledging its Platonic origin, they often referred it back to a different set of ancient authors such as Anaxagoras and Hesiod. My contribution examines this shift in the interpretation of primeval chaos and the systematic use of “authoritative coordinates” in the debate on the tenability of this theory. Firstly, I examine some influential sources of the theory of primeval chaos, with specific emphasis on Ovid and Calcidius. Secondly, I discuss some of the main features of the 12th century debate on primordial disorder in relation to the first reception of Aristotle’s works in Latin Europe. Thirdly, I analyse three important case-studies from the 13th-century treatment of this topic: Roger Bacon, Thomas Aquinas, and Albert the Great. Their refutations of primeval chaos and its traditional authoritative coordinates shed light on the extent of the interpretative reshaping of this theory in the 13th century. Finally, I show that the main doctrinal reasons behind such a doctrinal restyling of primeval chaos proceed from Aristotelian hylomorphism. Nonetheless, other aspects of this process are still unclear, starting from the substitution of the “old” auctoritates (Plato, Ovid, Calcidius) with “new” authors (Anaxagoras, Empedocles, Hesiod) whose works were only partially and mediately known by medieval philosophers.
Download options
The Peregrinations of the Soul in the Afterlife: A Work from Late 12th-Century Iberia. Introduction, Edition, and Translation
2022 | With Charles Burnett. In Mark of Toledo: Intellectual Context and Debates between Christians and Muslims in Early Thirteenth Century Iberia. Edited by Charles Burnett and Pedro Mantas-España. Cordoba: UCOPress, London: The Warburg Institute, 2022, pp. 155-195.
Further info
Abstract
The Peregrinations of the Soul in the Afterlife is a highly original text on Christian philosophy concerning the possible directions the human soul can take after death. The vocabulary and sources strongly suggest that the work was written in the circle of Dominicus Gundissalinus in the late twelfth century, and could therefore have been written in Toledo in the milieu of Marcus of Toledo. Its intelligent blend of Arabic philosophical texts (largely translated by Gundissalinus and his team) and Christian theological references make it well worth further study, which can be facilitated by the new edition and English translation provided in this article.
Download options
Robert Grosseteste on Motion, Bodies, and Light
2021 | British Journal for the History of Philosophy 29/6 (2021): 1034–1053.
Further info
DOI: 10.1080/09608788.2021.1939651
Abstract
The article dissects Grosseteste’s theory of the origin of bodily motion discussed in De motu corporali et luce. The first section examines Grosseteste’s discussion of the metaphysical structure of body qua body and the postulation of a kind of original motion (motion qua motion) as a common feature to all bodies. The second section discusses how Grosseteste’s stance on the ontological structure of bodies is connected to his claim that motion qua motion is originated by the apprehensive power as such. The latter is a generic feature common to the apprehensive powers of celestial intelligences, humans, and animals. Finally, the last section of the article analyses Grosseteste’s identification of light with the cause of five kinds of change. Stressing the tensions within his treatment of this problem, I argue that Grosseteste elaborates a remarkably original theory of the ontological structure of corporeal beings, which stems from his blending of Aristotelian natural philosophy with metaphysical assumptions inherited from the Platonic tradition.
Download options
Hugh of St Victor, Dominicus Gundissalinus and the Place of the Mechanical Arts in Medieval Architectures of Knowledge
2021 | With Alexander Fidora. Revue de Théologie et de Philosophie 153/3 (2021): 291-318.
Further info
Abstract
This contribution engages with the problematic position of the mechanical arts within medieval systems of knowledge. Superseding the secondary position assigned to the mechanical arts in the Early Middle Ages, the solutions proposed by Hugh of St Victor and Gundissalinus were highly influential during the thirteenth century. While Hugh’s integration of the mechanical arts into his system of knowledge betrays their still ancillary position as regards consideration of the liberal arts, Gundissalinus’s theory proposes two main novelties. On the one hand, he sets the mechanical arts alongside alchemy and the arts of prognostication and magic. On the other, however, using the theory put forward by Avicenna, he subordinates these “natural sciences” to natural philosophy itself, thereby establishing a broader architecture of knowledge hierarchically ordered. Our contribution examines the implications of and the reception afforded to such developments at Paris during the thirteenth century, emphasising the relevance that the solutions offered by Gundissalinus enjoyed in terms of the ensuing discussions concerning the structure of human knowledge.
Download options
Early Robert Grosseteste on Matter
2021 | Notes and Records: the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science 75/3 (2021): 397–414.
Further info
DOI: 10.1098/rsnr.2020.0017
Abstract
This article investigates the origin of Robert Grosseteste’s theory of matter. Covering Grosseste’s early production, from his De artibus liberalibus to De luce and the Commentarius on Aristotle’s Physics,the article examines Grosseteste’s gradual developing of a philosophical theory of matter and prime matter by means of his progressive study of the works of the Aristotelian tradition. Surprisingly, Grosseteste’s first notion of matter is bound to alchemy and astrology. It is a physical notion of matter as subject to astral influence and human manipulation. Only with his study of Aristotle’s Physics, does Grosseteste elaborate a more Aristotelian theory of matter, directly engaging himself with the manifold problems of assimilating Aristotle’s theories into a Christian-based speculation. As a consequence, a much refined version of his theory of matter is presented in the commentary on the Physics and De luce, where prime matter is envisioned as an extensionless point containing in itself the possibility of the existence of the entire universe. Notwithstanding the gradually more philosophical attitude marking Grosseteste’s reflection, some tension between the alchemical and metaphysical epistemes of matter he engaged with can be appreciated throughout much of Grosseteste’s early production.
Download options
The Philosophy and Science of Roger Bacon. Studies in Honour of Jeremiah Hackett
2021 | Edited by Nicola Polloni and Yael Kedar. London: Routledge, 2021.
Further info
ISBN: 978-03-6747-1743
Abstract
This volume collects thirteen scholarly contributions on the life, thought, and context of one of the most fascinating characters of medieval culture, Roger Bacon. The volume is also meant to celebrate one of the most influential interpreters of Bacon’s thought, Professor Jeremiah Hackett, who has recently retired and whose many contributions have shaped the scholarly consideration of Roger Bacon profoundly and substantively. At least since John Dee’s rediscovery of Bacon’s works and, for different reasons, Robert Greene’s Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay, the name of Roger Bacon is bound to the “Romantic” character of a peculiar scientist interested in the secrets of nature and living in a time of darkness. When the common perception is contrasted with the historical data, this fictional image fades away. The Middle Ages, and especially the 13th century, were not a time of darkness. The renewal of science and philosophy started in the 12th century, and flourished during Bacon’s time with the discovery of new sciences, new theories, and new interests. In this context, however, it is surely true that Bacon’s activity was characterised by some peculiar traits that nourished much of the early-modern narrative about him. He harshly criticised the world he was living in and, particularly, the academic system and the two mendicant orders, Dominicans and Franciscans. He publicly and repeatedly supported the study and practice of problematic sciences like alchemy and astrology and became a central advocate of the use of mathematics and experimental science for the mastery of nature. He was the proponent of a profound reshaping of Latin culture through a reform of the education system, the details of which he submitted to the Pope.
Download options
Disentangling Roger Bacon’s Criticism of Medieval Translations
2021 | In Early Thirteenth-Century English Franciscan Thought. Edited by Lydia Schumacher. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021, pp. 261–282.
Further info
Abstract
In his Compendium studii philosophiae, Roger Bacon declares that ‘were I to have power over the books of Aristotle I would have them all burned because it is nothing but a waste of time to study them, a cause of error, and a multiplication of error beyond what can be accounted for.’ Bacon’s pyromaniac attitude to Aristotle is not due to his dislike of the acclaimed Philosopher, but rather to the Latin rendering of his works. Bacon points out that ‘since the labors of Aristotle are the foundations of all of science, no one can estimate how great the damage is to Latins because of the bad translations philosophers have received.’ Apparently, nothing can be better than something, if the latter is a source of error and discord. Expanding on the same line of reasoning, Bacon observes that it would be better to do as Robert Grosseteste did (pace sua), when he ‘entirely disregarded the books of Aristotle and their methods’ – at least according to Bacon. One might wonder, what was so bad about the Latin translations of Aristotle to motivate such harsh criticism by Bacon? In the following pages, I want to discuss Roger Bacon’s critique of the Latin translators and present a different interpretation of Bacon’s stance. This topic has been studied by Gabriel Théry and Richard Lemay. In their discussion of Bacon’s position, however, both scholars appear to have been quite unable to distinguish theory from rhetoric, purpose from persuasiveness, and the historical actor from the historical witness. As a consequence, the biases they see and blame in Bacon’s criticism of the translators are mirrored by their own criticism of Bacon’s words.
Download options
Roger Bacon on the Conceivability Matter
2021 | In Roger Bacon and Medieval Science and Philosophy. Studies in Honour of Jeremiah Hackett. Edited by Nicola Polloni and Yael Kedar. London: Routledge, 2021, pp. 76-97.
Further info
Abstract
This contribution analyses Roger Bacon’s solution to the problem of how humans can conceive matter. Being potential and formless, the effort to ground a partial knowability of matter has intrigued many medieval philosophers. Their solutions were often intertwined with the ontological assumptions they made about this peculiar metaphysical entity and their ontological commitment about its existence. In the case of Bacon, this already problematic point is further complicated by his complex ontology based on radical formal pluralism (= any composite has a plurality of non-incidental forms) and extreme realism. The first section of the chapter examines Bacon’s discussion of the problem in his Questions on Physics, where the solution is provided by the analogical strategy: matter can be known by analogy to the form. However, can this procedure be applied also to the case of prime matter? The second section explores Bacon’s distinction between secondary and specific matters and the ontological structure characterising the composite that he envisioned. I argue that the analogical strategy must be complemented with another procedure able to get below “the matter we know” (proximate matter). The third section analyses Bacon’s criticism of the doctrine of the unicity of matter in the Opus tertium. In this context, I examine Bacon’s discussion of reversed abstraction to conceive the genus generalissimum and argue that this procedure is required to complement the analogical strategy in the case of the conceivability of prime matter.
Download options
The Twelfth-Century Renewal of Latin Metaphysics: Gundissalinus’s Ontology of Matter and Form
2020 | Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 2020.
Further info
ISBN: 9780888448651
Abstract
Medieval metaphysics is usually bound up with Scholasticism and its influential exemplars, such as Aquinas and Duns Scotus. However, the foundations of the new discipline, which would reshape the entire edifice of Western philosophy, were established well before the rise of Scholasticism through an encounter with the Arabic philosophical tradition. The Twelfth-Century Renewal of Latin Metaphysics uncovers what rightly should be considered the first attempt to construct a metaphysical system in the Latin Middle Ages in the work of Dominicus Gundissalinus. A philosopher and translator who worked in Toledo in the second half of the twelfth century, Gundissalinus elaborated a fascinating metaphysics grounded on a substantive revision of the Latin tradition through the work of Avicenna, Ibn Gabirol, and al-Farabi. Based on a series of structural dualities of being that express the ontological difference between the caused universe and the uncaused creator who lies beyond any duality, it was to prove original and far-reaching. With Gundissalinus we witness the first Latin appropriation of crucial doctrines, like the modal distinction between necessary and possible existence, formal pluralism, and universal hylomorphism. This study thoroughly analyses Gundissalinus’s revisionary interpretation of his Latin and Arabic sources, paying particular attention to the “unlikely blending” of Ibn Gabirol’s universal hylomorphism and Avicenna’s modal ontology which became the cornerstone of his metaphysics.
Reviews
A.W. Arlig, Speculum 97/4 (2022) [read], R. Ishida, 中世思想研究 63 (2021) [read], R. Saccenti, Mediterranea 7 (2022) [read]
Download options
A Matter of Philosophers and Spheres: Medieval Glosses on Artephius’s Key of Wisdom
2020 | Ambix, 67/2 (2020): 135-153.
Further info
DOI: 10.1080/00026980.2020.1747307
Abstract
The article examines the two Latin versions of Artephius’s Clavis sapientiae (Key of Wisdom) that have been preserved in early modern collections of alchemical texts. A comparative analysis of the two versions shows that one of them has undergone a process of textual manipulation. In particular, an interpolation of short philosophical passages concerning the doctrine of prime matter has relevant interpretative implications. These additions appear to be grounded in the early thirteenth-century philosophical debate on cosmology and the first Latinate reception of Aristotle’s metaphysics.
Download options
Gundissalinus on the Angelic Creation of the Human Soul: A Peculiar Example of Philosophical Appropriation
2019 | Oriens 47/3-4 (2019): 313-347.
Further info
DOI: 10.1163/18778372-04800200
Abstract
With his original reflection—deeply influenced by many important Arabic thinkers—Gundissalinus wanted to renovate the Latin debate concerning crucial aspects of the philosophical tradition. Among the innovative doctrines he elaborated, one appears to be particularly problematic, for it touches a very delicate point of Christian theology: the divine creation of the human soul, and thus, the most intimate bond connecting the human being and his Creator. Notwithstanding the relevance of this point, Gundissalinus ascribed the creation of the human soul to the angels rather than God. He also stated that the angels create the souls from prime matter, and through a kind of causality which cannot be operated by God. What are the sources of this unusual and perilous doctrine? And what are the reasons which led Gundissalinus to hold such a problematic position? This article thoroughly examines the theoretical development and sources of Gundissalinus’s position, focusing on the correlations between this doctrine, the overall cosmological descriptions expounded by Gundissalinus in his original works, and the main sources upon which this unlikely doctrine is grounded: Avicenna and Ibn Gabirol.
Download options
The Liberal Arts: Inheritances and Conceptual Frameworks
2019 | With Giles Gasper, Sigbjorn Sønnesyn, Neil Lewis, and Jack Cunningham. In Knowing and Speaking: Robert Grosseteste’s De artibus liberalibus ‘On the Liberal Arts’ and De generatione sonorum ‘On the Generation of Sounds’. Edited by Giles Gasper, Cecilia Panti, Tom McLeish, and Hannah Smithson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, pp. 36–50.
Further info
Abstract
To contextualize this somewhat beguiling treatise is to understand it at once product of Grosseteste’s own thinking, as as a a response and reaction to his inheritances, ancient and more contemporary, and as a distinctive contribution to wider shifts in the way that the arts were conceived. What follows offers a description and commentary of the developments of the liberal arts, as conceptual framework and institutional platform, from late antiquity to Grosseteste’s lifetime. This allows an overview of changes to the liberal arts as a whole, and within the individual arts, and a wider perspective in which to consider Grosseteste’s achievements in this area. Some of the authors and texts discussed would not have been familiar to Grosseteste, but others would, bringing to the fore questions about the textual sources he dwelt with in the composition of his treatise.
Download options
The Use of the Stars: Alchemy, Plants, and Medicine
2019 | With Giles Gasper, Sigbjorn Sønnesyn, Anne Lawrence-Mathers, and Nader El-Bizri. In Knowing and Speaking: Robert Grosseteste’s De artibus liberalibus ‘On the Liberal Arts’ and De generatione sonorum ‘On the Generation of Sounds’. Edited by Giles Gasper, Cecilia Panti, Tom McLeish, and Hannah Smithson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, pp. 166–195.
Further info
Abstract
The final sections (§§11-13) of On the Liberal Arts move to the uses of astronomy in natural philosophy with three specific examples: the planting of plants, the transmutation of metals, and medical interventions. Grosseteste’s conceptual framework for astronomy emerges from a variety of sources, mediating different models of the cosmos and its operations and components. The emphasis on the quadrivial arts and their application within the disciplines of natural philosophy marks his text out as significantly different from previous medieval treatises on the liberal arts, and the focus on astronomy as the culmination of the applicability of the arts is rarer still. The stress laid on astronomy at the culmination of the treatise offers particular insight into the broader worldview that frames Grosseteste’s conception of the liberal arts.
Download options
Vedere nell’ombra: Studi su natura, spiritualità e scienze operative offerti a Michela Pereira
2018 | Edited by Cecilia Panti and Nicola Polloni. Firenze: SISMEL – Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2018.
Further info
ISBN: 9788884508133.
Abstract
The volume collects twenty-eight original essays by colleagues and friends of Michela Pereira offered on the occasion of her seventieth birthday. As a pioneer of the re-evaluation of fundamental areas of the Western philosophical and scientific tradition, starting with alchemy, Michela Pereira has dedicated important studies to Hildegard of Bingen, Roger Bacon, Ramon Llull, in addition to being one of the most authoritative interpreters of the feminist movement in the modern world. «Seeing in the shadow», the title of this volume, recalls a suggestive image coined by Hildegard to establish a connection between the work of creation, human nature and prophetic knowledge, three contexts around which the interests of Michela Pereira turn. The essays of the volume interpret these topics in many thought-provoking ways. Covering a wide temporal arc, from late Antiquity to Early Modern Times, and ranging from alchemy and medicine to spirituality, prophecy and myth, from the body-soul relation to performative arts, such as theatre and music, they also include brief editions of unedited medieval texts and an updated bibliography of Michela Pereira’s publications.
Download options
Nature, Souls, and Numbers: Remarks on a Medieval Gloss on Gundissalinus’s De processione mundi
2018 | In Causality and Resemblance. Medieval Approaches to the Explanation of Nature. Edited by María Jesús Soto-Bruna. Hildesheim, Zürich, and New York: OLMS, 2018, pp. 75-87.
Further info
Abstract
Gundissalinus’s De processione mundi expounds a detailed description of the institution of the universe based on a fascinating range of Latin and Arabic sources. Realising a synthesis between Avicenna’s and Avicebron’s metaphysical positions, the universe depicted by Gundissalinus is grounded upon a delicate and yet intrinsically coherent web of interpretations of divergent philosophical perspectives. A rather problematic point of De processione mundi is the use Gundissalinus makes of the ratio numerorum. In particular, his use of numerical series—twice in the text—to demonstrate the completeness of the created universe appears to entail striking contradictions with what Gundissalinus claims in his treatise. My contribution addresses this “consistency problem” pointing out that the meaning of the two numerological series can be clarified through a curious gloss on the text attested by the entire manuscript tradition of De processione mundi.
Download options
The Toledan Translation Movement and Dominicus Gundissalinus: Some Remarks on His Activity and Presence in Castile
2018 | In A Companion to Medieval Toledo. Reconsidering the Canons. Edited by Yasmine Beale-Rivaya and Jason Busic. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2018, pp. 263-280.
Further info
Abstract
The origins of the Toledan translation movement can be traced back to the translation activities developed in Southern Italy and Northern Spain since the end of the eleventh century. In Italy, the translations were realized from Greek into Latin; whereas in Catalonia and the Ebro valley, translators as Plato of Tivoli, Robert of Ketton, and Hermann of Carinthia translated Arabic writings. Following different linguistic tracks, these first translations shared a common interest on scientific works, and particularly astronomy. The activity of these first translators was also directly connected to the main scientific milieux of the time, namely Salerno and Chartres, where the translated texts were read and used.
Download options
L’acqua che si trasforma in pietra. Gundissalinus e Avicenna sulla generazione dei metalli
2018 | In Vedere nell’ombra. Studi su natura, spiritualità e scienze operative offerti a Michela Pereira. Edited by Cecilia Panti and Nicola Polloni. Florence: SISMEL – Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2018, pp. 103-119.
Further info
Abstract
What are the sources of a curious example of generation mentioned by Gundissalinus, by which water becomes a stone? This contribution explores the theoretical aims of the example presented in De processione mundi, assessing the Avicennian doctrinal framework in which it is placed by Gundissalinus. The origin of the example itself, though, appears to be far more complicated. After examining possible Latin sources and the alchemical implications suggested by the example, the study focuses on a different hypothesis: that Gundissalinus had access to the Arabic version of Avicenna’s De generatione and corruptione.
Download options
Domingo Gundisalvo: Una introducción
2017 | Madrid: Editorial Sindéresis, 2017.
Further info
ISBN: 9788416262342
Abstract
Gundisalvo desempeñó su papel principal como filósofo, y como tal, fue el primero en acoger críticamente las doctrinas avicenianas, farabianas, gabirolianas y aristotélicas. En este sentido, Gundisalvo nos proporciona un panorama donde el platonismo timaico típico de la Escuela de Chartres y de Hermann de Carintia estaba en crisis y que, en varias décadas, llegó a ser superado por la revolución aristotélica del siglo XIII. En sus escritos, Gundisalvo parece quedarse entre las dos orillas de este caudal especulativo, acogiendo el aristotelismo neoplatónico árabe y rechazando fundamentos doctrinales timaicos, sin renegar de su formación platónica y boeciana. Por consiguiente, además del explícito valor de sus traducciones y de aquellos textos que tuvieron una gran difusión y recepción, como el De divisione o el De unitate, resulta evidente el valor implícito de la figura de Domingo Gundisalvo como filósofo un contexto cultural irrepetible como lo fue Toledo en el siglo XII.
Download options
Gundissalinus and Avicenna: Some Remarks on an Intricate Philosophical Connection
2017 | Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 28 (2017): 515-552.
Further info
DOI: 10.36167/DSTFM28PDF
Abstract
This article analyses the peculiarities of Dominicus Gundissalinus’s reading and use of Avicenna’s writings in his original works. Gundissalinus (1120ca – post 1190) is indeed the Latin translator of Avicenna’s De anima and Liber de philosophia prima, but also an original philosopher whose writings are precious witnesses of the very first reception of Avicennian philosophy in the Latin West. The article points out the structural bond with the Persian philosopher upon which Gundissalinus grounds his own speculation. This contribution stresses, in particular, the important role played by Avicenna’s psychology, epistemology, and metaphysics in order to provide Gundissalinus with a different set of answers to at least two main questions. On the one hand, the problem of creatural existence and cosmological causation, concerning which Gundissalinus tends to doctrinally merge Avicenna with Ibn Gabirol. On the other hand, Avicenna’s influence is crucial for Gundissalinus’s attempt at elaborating a new system of knowledge, which was supposed to be able to include the new sciences made available by the translation movement, but that also needed to be internally organised through firm epistemological principles. Beside his crucial contribution as translator, Gundissalinus’s first philosophical encounter with the Avicenna paved the road for the subsequent reception of the Persian philosopher’s works, opening a hermeneutical perspective which would be pivotal for the thirteenth-century discussions on soul, knowledge, and being.
Download options
Appropriation, Interpretation and Criticism: Philosophical and Theological Exchanges Between the Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Intellectual Traditions
2017 | Edited by Alexander Fidora and Nicola Polloni. Barcelona – Roma: FIDEM, 2017.
Further info
ISBN: 9782503577449.
Abstract
The volume gathers eleven studies on the intellectual exchanges during the Middle Ages among the three cultures which existed side by side in the same geographical area, i.e. the vast space from the British Isles to the Sahara Desert, and from the Douro Valley to the Hindu Kush. These three cultures – who may not be reduced to their confession or ethnicity – are historically related to each other in many respects, both material (trade, wars, marriages) and immaterial (the interdependence among their religious narratives and their philosophical speculations). The studies herein presented focus on some peculiar examples of the transcultural interactions among exponents of the Arabic, Hebrew and Latin philosophical and theological traditions. While we do not want to downplay the fundamental role of the religious contexts, our focus on the linguistic denominations of these cultures aims at drawing attention to the conceptual medium, or rather media, which underlined and shaped the interactions and interplays among these traditions – interplays that were characterized by the contact of these three languages being used by people of different religious beliefs in their quest for knowledge: Spanish Jews writing in Arabic, Jews collaborating in the translation of Arabic texts into Latin through the vernacular, Western Muslims whose writings were read mainly by Jews and Christians in Hebrew and Latin.
Download options
Toledan Ontologies: Gundissalinus, Ibn Daud, and the Problem of Gabirolian Hylomorphism
2017 | In Appropriation, Interpretation and Criticism: Philosophical and Theological Exchanges Between the Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Intellectual Tradition. Edited by Alexander Fidora and Nicola Polloni. Barcelona and Roma: FIDEM, 2017, pp. 19-49.
Further info
Abstract
This contribution focuses on a particular branch of Gundissalinus’s production, namely ontology, and a peculiar feature of his reflection: the progressive problematization of his doctrine of hylomorphism. I will analyse the sources that influenced Gundissalinus’s mature discussion of ontological composition, underscoring the changes introduced by the Toledan philosopher to his previous doctrinal positions regarding the status of hylomorphic components and their cosmogonic causation. In order to do so, I will briefly examine the opposing theories elaborated by Ibn Gabirol and Ibn Sīnā, doctrines merged together by Gundissalinus in his final metaphysical reflection. Eventually, I will put forward a hypothesis about a possible medium of both Gundissalinus’s change of position and his doctrinal synthesis – i.e., Ibn Daud’s philosophical influence on Gundissalinus.
Download options
Gundissalinus on Necessary Being: Textual and Doctrinal Alterations in the Exposition of Avicenna’s Metaphysics
2016 | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 26/1 (2016): 129-160.
Further info
DOI: 10.1017/S0957423915000144
Abstract
This article examines the textual alteration strategy carried out by Dominicus Gundissalinus in his original works. One of the most striking examples of this approach can be detected in the large quotation of Avicenna’s Philosophia prima I, 6–7 in Gundissalinus’ cosmological treatise De processione mundi, in which the Spanish philosopher variously modifies the text he translated a few years before. After a short presentation of Gundissalinus’ double role as translator and philosopher, the study moves on to the analysis of Avicenna’s doctrine of necessary and possible being, and the five demonstrations of the unrelated uniqueness of necessary being offered by Avicenna. These arguments are directly quoted by Gundissalinus: nevertheless, the author modifies the text in many passages, here examined through the analysis of some representative excerpts. The results of this enquiry suggest that Gundissalinus is following an effective alteration strategy, envisaging at least two main purposes: the clarification of Avicenna’s line of reasoning, and the doctrinal assimilation of Philosophia prima’s theories in his original philosophical system. In appendix to this article the whole text of the two versions of Philosophia prima I, 6–7 is presented.
Bosnian translation
Bosnian translation published in Logos – Časopis za filozofiju i religiju 7/1-2 (2018): 71-101.
Download options
Gundissalinus’s Application of al-Fārābī’s Metaphysical Programme. A Case of Epistemological Transfer
2016 | Mediterranea. International Journal on the Transfer of Knowledge 1 (2016): 69-106.
Further info
DOI: 10.21071/mijtk.v0i1.5174
Abstract
This study deals with Dominicus Gundissalinus’s discussion on metaphysics as philosophical discipline. Gundissalinus’s translation and re-elaboration of al-Fārābī’s Iḥṣā’ al-ʿulūm furnish him, in the De scientiis, a specific and detailed procedure for metaphysical analysis articulated in two different stages, an ascending and a descending one. This very same procedure is presented by Gundissalinus also in his De divisione philosophiae, where the increased number of sources –in particular, Avicenna– does not prevent Gundissalinus to quote the entire passage on the methods of metaphysical science from the Iḥṣā’ al-ʿulūm, with some slight changes in his Latin translation. The analytical procedure herein proposed becomes an effective ‘metaphysical programme’ with regards to Gundissalinus’s onto-cosmological writing, the De processione mundi. The comparative analysis of this treatise with the procedure received by al-Fārābī shows Gundissalinus’s effort to follow and apply this metaphysical programme to his own reflection, in a whole different context from al-Fārābī’s and presenting doctrines quite opposed to the theoretical ground on which al-Fārābī’s epistemology is based, like ibn Gabirol’s universal hylomorphism. Nevertheless, thanks to the application of the ‘metaphysical programme’, one can effectively claim that Gundissalinus’s metaphysics is, at least in the author’s intentions, a well-defined metaphysical system. In appendix to this article the three Latin versions of al-Fārābī’s discussion on metaphysics are reported, e.g., Gundissalinus’s quotations in De scientiis and De divisione philosophiae, and Gerard of Cremona’s translation in his De scientiis.
Download options
Aristotle in Toledo: Gundissalinus, the Arabs, and Gerard of Cremona’s Translations
2016 | In ‘Ex Oriente Lux’. Translating Words, Scripts and Styles in the Medieval Mediterranean Society. Edited by Charles Burnett and Pedro Mantas. Córdoba: UCOPress, London: The Warburg Institute, 2016, pp. 147-185.
Further info
Abstract
At least since the first decade of the thirteenth century, therefore, the Aristotelian texts translated by Gerard of Cremona were studied, used, and quoted in the Île-de-France and England. Nonetheless, these texts had been available since at least 1187, the year in which Gerard of Cremona died in Toledo, and probably beforehand. The period of time between the composition and completion of the translations and the first attested receptions of Aristotle in England and France indicates a chronological gap with respect to the use of these sources and texts. A possible contribution to help clarify this thorny question may be suggested, namely, to examine the influence of Aristotle’s texts translated by Gerard before their spread throughout the continent. That is to say, to consider their reception in the Castilian capital, Toledo, where, during the second half of the twelfth century, at least three philosophers, Abraham ibn Daud, Dominicus Gundissalinus, and Daniel of Morley, are known to have lived and worked.
Download options
Thierry of Chartres and Gundissalinus on Spiritual Substances: The Problem of Hylomorphic Composition
2015 | Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale 57, 2015: 35-57.
Further info
DOI: 10.1484/J.BPM.5.110804
Abstract
In this contribution I examine the problem of spiritual composition in Thierry of Chartres and Gundissalinus. While the former is quite reticent in admitting a spiritual hylomorphism, the latter develops Thierry’s outcomes through the results of al-Ghazali’s and Ibn Daud’s treatment of spiritual substances. The resulting ontology affirms that also spiritual creatures are composed of matter and form: an unacceptable perspective for the three sources used by Gundissalinus.
Download options
Elementi per una biografia di Dominicus Gundisalvi
2015 | Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littèraire du Moyen Âge 82, 2015: 7-22.
Further info
DOI: 10.3917/ahdlm.082.0007
Abstract
This study summarizes the main hypothesis and evidences in our possess regarding the biography of the translator and philosopher Dominicus Gundissalinus, who worked in Toledo during the second half of the 12th century. The main phases of Gundissalinus’life are presented through the exam of documental sources and data drawn from works ascribed to the “Gundissalinus’Circle”. The article clarifies some important aspects of Gundissalinus’ stay in Segovia, and tries to answer some questions regarding his transfer to Toledo in 1162.
Download options
Natura vero assimilatur quaternario: numerologia e neoplatonismo nel De processione mundi di Dominicus Gundissalinus
2015 | In De Natura. La naturaleza en la Edad Media. Edited by José Luis Fuertes Herreros and Ángel Poncela González. Ribeirão: Húmus, 2015, pp. 679-688.
Further info
Abstract
Nelle ultime pagine del De processione mundi, Dominicus Gundissalinus presenta due interessanti scansioni numerologiche dell’esistente a partire dai risultati dell’indagine sulla genesi del cosmo, affrontata nella trattazione anteriore. Già nelle pagine precedenti, il filosofo toledano manifesta una certa tendenza ad utilizzare la numerologia come strumento apodittico volto a suffragare l’argomentazione filosofica, sancendone così la validità in modo rigoroso. Un utilizzo, questo, che si esplicita in brani la cui paternità non è direttamente gundissaliniana, ma che sono risultanti da una combinazione delle tre fonti principali di Gundissalinus nella redazione del suo trattato: la Philosophia prima avicenniana, il De essentiis di Ermanno di Carinzia e il Fons vitae di Avicebron.
Download options
Il De processione mundi di Gundissalinus: prospettive per un’analisi genetico-dottrinale
2013 | Annali di Studi Umanistici 1 (2013): 25-38.
Further info
Abstract
Il De processione mundi si rivela un trattato di estremo interesse, tanto rispetto alla rielaborazione gundissaliniana delle dottrine ivi presentate in chiave non più propriamente platonica, quanto – e parallelamente – rispetto alla ricezione delle istanze critiche tipiche della seconda metà del XII secolo, che fungono da sostrato al rapido mutamento di paradigma speculativo nel giro di pochi decenni. Le questioni dottrinali che Gundissalinus si pone, gli esiti filosofici che accoglie dal mondo arabo e quelli che rigetta dalla tradizione latina ci lasciano intravedere la ricerca di nuove risposte a quelle domande cui il sistema platonico-timaico non appariva più in grado di far fronte. Ed è proprio il tentativo gundissaliniano di sviluppare una prospettiva ontologica nuova che prescindesse dalla crisi del platonismo – che egli già percepiva e che costituisce lo sfondo della sua riflessione – a condensare il maggiore interesse storico e filosofico per la sua figura. Comprendere Gundissalinus e la sua opera può così permettere di gettare luce su quel periodo che segna il tramonto del paradigma platonico e il rapido sorgere dell’aristotelismo quale Weltanschauung complessiva del XIII e XIV secolo.
Download options
Book Reviews
Ducos and Lucken 2018. Richard de Fournival et les sciences au XIIIe siècle. Florence: SISMEL – Edizioni del Galluzzo. ISBN: 978-8884508430
2021 | Aestimatio NS 2/1 (2021): 238-244.
Download
Hasse and Bertolacci 2018. The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Physics and Cosmology. Berlin: De Gruyter. ISBN 9781614517740
2021 | Isis 112/3 (2021): 598-599.
Download
Suarez-Nani and Paravicini Bagliani 2017. Materia. Nouvelles perspectives de recherche dans la pensée et la culture médiévales (XIIe-XVIe siècles). Florence: SISMEL – Edizioni del Galluzzo. ISBN: 9788884508072
2020 | Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 27/1 (2020): 199-210.
Download
Lammer 2018. The Elements of Avicenna’s Physics: Greek Sources and Arabic Innovations. Berlin: De Gruyter. ISBN 9783110543582
2019 | Isis 110/3 (2019): 586-587.
Download
Martínez Gázquez 2016. The Attitude of Medieval Latin Translators towards the Arabic Sciences. Florence: SISMEL – Edizioni del Galluzzo. ISBN: 9788884506948
2018 | Aestimatio 13 (2018): 141-144.
Download
Soto Bruna and Alonso del Real 2015. De unitate et uno de Dominicus Gundissalinus. Pamplona: EUNSA. ISBN: 9788431329426
2016 | Anuario filosófico 49/2 (2016): 484-486.
Download
Pessin 2013. Ibn Gabirol’s Theology of Desire. Matter and Method in Jewish Medieval Neoplatonism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9781107032217
2015 | Theology and Sexuality 21/2 (2015): 163-165.
potestas essendi 